We have been busy creating new products - Take a look here New Products

Outdated Safety Data Sheets: Hidden Risks in University Labs

Outdated Safety Data Sheets: Hidden Risks in University Labs

Dave Tabar Dave Tabar
6 minute read

Listen to article
Audio generated by DropInBlog's Blog Voice AI™ may have slight pronunciation nuances. Learn more

Let’s talk about outdated Safety Data Sheets and compliance gaps – especially in academic research. Every year, thousands of students, post-docs, and faculty walk into university chemistry, biology, and engineering labs trusting that the safety information at their fingertips is accurate. Most of the time it is. But when it isn’t—when the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) on the bench is three, five, or even ten years out of date—the consequences can be sudden and expensive.

What Exactly Is an SDS and Why Should You Care?

Safety Data Sheets involve a 16-section document that tells you everything you need to know to work safely with a chemical: what it is, what hazards it poses, how to handle spills, what PPE to wear, how to fight a fire involving it, and how to store it so it doesn’t react with the bottle next to it.

Under OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200), chemical manufacturers and importers must update an SDS within three months of learning significant new hazard information. Laboratories, in turn, are required to have the most current version readily accessible to anyone who might be exposed.

Yet reality on the ground looks very different.

The Sobering Statistics

  • At least 10% of Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) in unreviewed university collections are outdated.
  • The average age gap between the SDS on file and the current manufacturer version is 3.3 years.
  • A 2022 American Chemical Society survey found 20–30% of university labs non-compliant with HazCom, with outdated or missing SDSs being the top citation.
  • A separate peer-reviewed study in the Journal of Safety Research that inspected 50 U.S. institutions reported a 22% SDS failure rate.

In plain English: roughly one in five Safety Data Sheets sitting in a college lab right now has a problem.

Why Is This So Common in Academia?

Universities are not chemical plants with dedicated compliance teams. They’re decentralized ecosystems where each principal investigator (PI) essentially runs a small company. Combine that structure with five unique pressures and you get the perfect recipe for drift:

  1. Decentralized chemical ownership – Professor A’s lab, Professor B’s lab, and the teaching stockroom may all have the same chemical but three different SDS versions.
  2. High turnover – Grad students and post-docs cycle out every few years, inheriting decades-old reagents and the ancient binder that came with them.
  3. Resource constraints – Many smaller departments still use paper “red binders” because an electronic system feels like a luxury.
  4. Third-party SDS services that quietly fall behind – Even paid platforms sometimes lag if the vendor doesn’t receive the update from the manufacturer.
  5. Internet scavenging – A frantic undergrad Googles “acrylotonitrile SDS,” grabs the first PDF they see—an older version—and prints it.

Real-World Consequences

Outdated information on Safety Data Sheets isn’t just a paperwork problem. Here are three documented cases that should make any lab manager lose sleep:

  1. Chemical incompatibility overlooked An updated SDS added a new incompatible class of compounds. The lab continued to store the chemical exactly where it always had. Result:unplanned reaction, toxic release, building evacuation, and a six-figure cleanup bill.
  2. Wrong flammability classification for flammable aerosol. An outdated SDS once listed an aerosol product as a “Level 1” or “Level 2” aerosol when it actually qualified as a far more flammable “Level 3” aerosol (the highest flammability category under NFPA 30B, based on heat-of-combustion calculations). Relying on that incorrect rating, facilities that designed warehouse sprinkler systems would have insufficient water density delivered to the fire. When a fire eventually occurs, the results could be disastrous due to the under-designed sprinkler system.
  3. Combustible dust mischaracterized A manufacturer originally classified a metallic powder as a “low hazard, combustible solid.” Years later, new testing showed the material was explosible when dispersed as a dust cloud in its native powder form. Labs that never received the revised SDS continued handling it without explosion-proof machinery, ventilation or bonding/grounding—until the day they didn’t.

OSHA fines for willful HazCom violations now start at $15,681 per instance (2025 adjusted amount). More importantly, personal injury, liability and reputational damage can be catastrophic.

How to Fix It – Practical Steps That Actually Work

The good news: keeping current SDSs is easier than it’s ever been.

  1. Make “Check Section 16” a habit, as Section 16 contains the revision date. If it’s more than 12–18 months old, assume it’s stale. You may find the exact product name + catalog number + “SDS” on the manufacturer’s website—most always you’ll get the newest one in seconds. But check with the manufacturer directly where in doubt.
  2. Use your institution’s EHS portal first, but verify. Most large universities now license automated systems (Chemwatch, VelocityEHS, Sphera, etc.). These are excellent—when they’re kept current. Always cross-check Section 16 against the manufacturer original.
  3. Scan the QR code on the container. More and more suppliers (Sigma, Fisher, Avantor) now print QR codes that link directly to the live SDS. It takes seconds and is always current.
  4. Set up manufacturer email alerts. Many chemical suppliers allow you to register products so they can push out new SDS revisions to you automatically.
  5. During lab clean-outs, treat every binder SDS as suspect. If you find a document titled “Material Safety Data Sheet” (the pre-2015 name), recycle it immediately—those are guaranteed to be GHS-noncompliant.

The Cultural Shift That’s Already Happening

Over 80% of large U.S. research universities have now migrated to automated SDS management platforms. That’s huge progress from even five years ago. But software alone isn’t enough; it must be paired with a culture that treats the SDS as a living document, not set-it-and-forget-it paperwork. EHS administrators and lab safety officers all share the responsibility. A five-minute check today can prevent a five-alarm incident tomorrow.

Final Thought

Safety Data Sheets are the instruction manual for every hazardous chemical on campus. Running your lab on an outdated manual is like flying a plane with a 1980s cockpit checklist—technically possible, but why take the risk?

Take a few minutes right now. Check your Section 16s on a random sample of SDSs.

When were they last revised?

If the answer makes you uncomfortable, you’re not alone—and you now know exactly what to do about it.

Stay safe out there and keep those SDSs current.

« Back to Blog

BACK TO TOP